|
A PAST ARTICLE FROM REEL DEALS The Aussie Film Collectors Magazine
The original version of this article appeared in REEL DEALS back in 1995. Color film fade is a continuing problem for those who collect film on film formats. Judging by the number of films in my collection that are “on the turn” the information is as relevant today as it ever was. COLOR FILM TYPES Whether it be the recently obtained print with the pinkish grass, or the old favorite that looked fine the last time it was screened 2 years ago, or the prized western that's been in the collection for years that seems to have less blue in the sky each time it's screened, these films are suffering from color fade. Many color films produced over the past 40 years are showing signs of the color fading. The amount of fading can range from a slight shift in color balance to, in the worst instance, almost no color at all, with only a pale light pink image being visible. Industry experts attribute this problem to a variety of causes; these include poor stability of the print stock, incorrect processing, high temperature rapid processing, poor storage, high humidity, etc. Probably all of these factors play a part, but all evidence now points to the first reason as being the major cause. If this is the case, then all we can do is to try and slow down the process by storing our films in the coolest spot available.
Most discussion on color fade takes place with the assumption that the fade has been
towards the red or pink end of the spectrum. Whilst this is the result on the
screen, the problem results from a combination of the color emulsions fading –
in particular the green emulsion, leaving the reds to predominate the image. The
end result will depend on the degree to which each of the three colors that make
up the image has faded.
It should also be realized; that not all color fade is in the red direction –
there are plenty of examples of films that have faded towards the brown, green
or even yellow.
The following information on various color film types may assist in selecting films
that will retain their color.
IB TECHNICOLOR:
This process in its modern three-color form was used from 1935 until it's demise in
the 1970s. The letters IB refer to the process of " imbibition " or
dye transfer printing. Technicolor was not printed photographically, but used a
printing process involving dyes, similar to that used for color magazine
reproductions.
An
"IB TECH." print can usually be distinguished by its bright sharp
colors and a sound track of either silver/grey or blue.
Technicolor prints were produced in 35mm, 16mm and 8mm formats. 7Omm was
never printed in Technicolor.
As this process wa
Technicolor prints are subject to the same wear and tear as any other film. As the vast
majority of genuine Technicolor films are now well over 40 years old, the
physical condition of the film should be checked before purchase.
Defective Technicolor prints are not unknown, apart from splices and scratches due to
wear, the main type of defects found are poor registration and poor color
balance, and ‘crazing’. These problems are predominately found with 16mm
prints.
Poor registration
is due to a printing problem, which has caused one of the three-color images to
be displaced from the others. The on-screen result is multi-color fringing on
solid edges.
Poor color balance
can result in excessive color level caused by an excess of one of the primary
printing colors; this is especially evident on facial coloring. It is
not unknown for the color balance to vary from one print to another, so if a
feature has been made up from two different prints, some variation in color may
be experienced from reel to reel.
"Crazing"
results in minute cracks in the color layers, giving irregular patterns of fine
random lines on the image. This effect can also sometimes be seen in the glaze
of dinner plates, etc.
The presence of the wording 'COLOR BY TECHNICOLOR' in the titles, should not be
taken as indicative of the print necessarily being in 'genuine' Technicolor. The
Technicolor labs changed over to release printing in Eastman Color after the
closure of their "IB" plant in the 1970s. It should also be noted that
many of the films originally released in genuine Technicolor have been re-released or
reprinted onto less stable color stock, even some onto black and white for early
TV release.
EASTMAN COLOR:
This print film manufactured by Kodak is predominately the film used for release
printing from the late 1960s through to the present time.
Prints made prior to the mid 1980s are particularly susceptible to fading; prints made
after that time are supposed to be more stable. Prints released under the
processing laboratory’s name, such as De Luxe Color, Metrocolor, Warner Color,
etc. are all printed on Eastman stock and are subject to the same fading
problems. The wording Eastman Kodak will be found within the sprocket area of
the film.
LPP:
This positive print film manufactured by Kodak is guaranteed low fade, and is
currently being used for release prints. The letters LPP can be found in the
perforation area (generally in yellow print). This film should offer the collector some certainty of a long color life.
KODACHROME:
This film is well known to home movie enthusiasts as camera stock. It has been used
for release printing of the occasional feature, but more often for shorts. Color
retention is very good, it can be recognized easily by its black sprocket area
and it’s name printed within the sprocket area. Be aware that Kodachrome is a
very contrasty film stock and that in many instances, prints will be found with
excessive contrast, giving very dark or sometime no detail in darker areas of
scenes. Also, it should be born in mind that although Kodachrome has been used
for the occasional feature film release on 16mm, it is also the film stock most
often used for color duping (see later).
FUJICOLOR:
In its early form was subject to color fading, my experience is that the fade is
often towards the green end of the spectrum. In common with Eastman Color its
color stability has improved over the years. It should be noted that the film
base is often polyester, which is somewhat thinner and more durable than the
usual acetate base. A tape splicer is required for joining.
CRI TECHNICOLOR:
There is no such thing! Many collectors ( and especially American dealers ) use this term to suggest
that you are getting a Technicolor print.
Color Reversal Intermediate (CRI) refers to the use of a fine grain duplicating
negative for the printing of the release print. The print is usually printed
onto Eastman Color or other release stock. The term “ CRI TECH. “ would
appear to result from the fact that many of these films have the wording
“COLOR BY TECHNICOLOR” in the title. This may also apply to re-issue prints
of original IB Technicolor prints.
DUPES:
Dupes are second-generation copies – usually copied from a ( perhaps well worn )
release print. A dupe as most collectors understand the term means that a release print has been
copied onto reversal film – that is there is no negative involved. Reversal
films are intended for camera use (such as home movies) and as such are fairly
contrasty. The usual question asked about a dupe is ‘how’s the contrast?’
The image can vary from reasonable grey scale to the ‘soot and white wash’
effect, where there is just nothing in between white and black.
In the hands of a good laboratory, a film can be copied to produce very acceptable
results – this usually involves producing a fine grain low contrast negative
from the original and then printing onto positive stock – not a cheap process.
Many dupes circulating amongst collectors appear to have been made “on the kitchen
table and processed in the bathtub”. The end result can range from pretty good
to very poor. The most common problem with black and white dupes results from
the use of unsuitable film stock. Unless low contrast duplicating stock is used
the end product will be overly contrasty with poor grey scale reproduction.
Color dupes are another thing altogether. Most color dupes can be picked for
poor color balance and lack of contrast. Usually the reds and blues are
reproduced poorly. Duplicating a color film is a very expensive process, and
good results will only be achieved by a reputable film laboratory.
Most color dupes that I have seen are not worth having !
Also, unless special care is taken to print the sound track separately, the sound will
usually be low level and have a high degree of hiss.
ARE RED FILMS WORTH BUYING? AND WHAT ARE THEY WORTH?
I occasionally ask myself the same question when I see a red print of a film that
I would like. If there is no other possibility of getting a print of a sought
after film and the price is right, well maybe. But remember the color will only
ever get worse with time.
There are lots of red films around, in all gauges. There are also a lot of collectors
who would like to get rid of red films at prices resembling what was originally
paid for them. My experience is that unless the film is something special, such
as a musical, it is very hard to get more than a few dollars for it.
© MIKE TRICKETT 1995 / 1999 / 2006
|